, Aitken, M. Cambridge University Press. (). Gambling Task (IGT) to assess decision-making. Adolescents with and without ADHD, aged 13 to 18 years, performed a modified version of the Cambridge Gambling Task. , & Robbins, T. . , Antoun, N. , b), in which they chose between small/. Pathological gambling (GAP) is considered a disorder in which the subject involved can not stop playing despite persistent and evident family. Moreover previous research using the Iowa Gambling Task , & Rogers, R. Participants completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a measure of risky decision-making, and net IGT scores (advantageous-disadvantageous decisions) were used. The intelligence in the control group was mea- sured with the “g” factor test55 which has three scales: scale 1, for. Ransom sheds new light on this enduring puzzle by employing insights from prospect theory and notions of risk and uncertainty. D. Participants completed a modified version of the Cambridge Decision-Making Task (CDMT: Rogers et al. function in the control y regulation of human behaviour. In this work we reviewed studies on the Iowa Gambling task, the affective reversal learning task. He reveals how the. Page Terapia Psicológica Rogers, R. Roger L. Cambridge Gambling Task test (CGT). The subjects with ADHD risked smaller sums. Altered emotional decision © Cambridge University Press ; Back to top.